Mother, 46, who left her newborn twins locked in Escalade for 40 minutes while she went shopping is banned from department store - Daily Mail Mother, 46, who left her newborn twins locked in Escalade for 40 minutes while she went shopping is banned from department store - Daily Mail
free web site traffic and promotion

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Mother, 46, who left her newborn twins locked in Escalade for 40 minutes while she went shopping is banned from department store - Daily Mail

Mother, 46, who left her newborn twins locked in Escalade for 40 minutes while she went shopping is banned from department store - Daily Mail

By Daily Mail Reporter

|

A 46-year-old woman who locked her 11-week-old twins in her car while she went shopping has been ordered to stay away from the department store and attend parenting classes.

Amanda Nejat left the babies alone for at least 40 minutes while she returned items to high-end shopping mall Nordstrom in Pleasanton, California, in February.

The mother, of Danville, pleaded no contest on Thursday to misdemeanor child endangerment at Alameda County Superior Court, according to the Contra Costa Times.

Concern: Amanda Nejat allegedly left her 11-week-old twins in her car in the a mall parking lot in California while she shopped for 40 minutes

Concern: Amanda Nejat allegedly left her 11-week-old twins in her car in the a mall parking lot in California while she shopped for 40 minutes

Under the plea agreement, Judge Jacob Blea ordered Nejat to stay away from Nordstrom and banned her from leaving her children unattended.

She'll also pay a $1,000 fine and must attend 52 counseling sessions and 26 parenting classes.

Authorities said that another shopper was walking through the mall's  parking lot in February when she heard cries from inside a Cadillac Escalade and peeked through the tinted glass.

Seeing no adult and the two babies in child seats, she alerted Pleasanton police and then security officers at the shopping centre.

Danger: Amanda Nejat left her 11-week-old twins in her car in the Stoneridge Mall parking lot (pictured) in California while she shopped for 40 minutes

Claims: Nejat originally told police she had popped into the Stoneridge Shopping Center to use the restroom - but surveillance footage showed her in shops

Security waited at the vehicle until Nejat returned. She was told to wait for police officers.

She claimed she had popped to the shopping centre to use the restroom, but surveillance footage showed she had been inside for 40 minutes.

She later admitted she had been returning items to the mall, police said.

Nejat's alleged actions appear at odds with her role as program director at the Bay Area Surrogacy Program, at which she gives new parents advice.

A professional online profile says that she provides 'comprehensive service guiding growing families with information, critical knowledge and support from beginning to post birth needs' in her role.

Officer Larry Cox from the Pleasanton Police Department said the passerby, a mother herself, had become concerned at the babies' cries.

Hidden: A passerby heard babies crying and peeked through the tinted windows to see the children inside. She alerted mall security officers and police

Hidden: A passerby heard babies crying and peeked through the tinted windows to see the children inside. She alerted mall security officers and police

'She kind of did a double take when she first heard this,' he told the Patch. 'As a parent, you know the difference between an infant cry and the cry of an older child.'

He added that Nejat had been cooperative when she returned to her car, where security officers and the witness were waiting.

'She didn't try to flee or anything like that,' he added.

She was taken into police custody after her husband Frank took their children home.

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Wow! A 46-year-old who has to be told not to leave her children unattended. Isn't that basic common-sense? She got off lightly in my opinion.

At 46, she's up there in age to have newborns. I infer from this that she tried very hard to have them or that they were adopted. Either way they must have been wanted very much. So how could she do this awful thing? She surely doesn't have the aptitude or knowledge to be a mother. I agree with Vicky, USA; Nordstrom, the Escalade and twins are all status symbols.

What a selfish, horrible person. Totally inexcusable.

Hey somewhere else, WHERE DO YOU LIVE? You see this every week? City of Irresponsible Parents? If this woman is rich enough to drive an escalade & shop Nordstroms then she got the money to hire a kid for 2 hrs.

Nordstrom stay away from that, take parenting class oh please why dont we seal her up un her vehicle take her to say Death Valley oh hell Iraq when its over 135 and leave there for say ummmmm 5 minutes when it gets super hot out there and say oh we forgot lol i am a mother of four kids i have never left my kids so I can go shopping what a dumb b&#*%

What an evil witch. The court let her off too easy.

We all get overwhelmed as parents and need some time to ourselves...but with an Escalade and a taste for Nordstroms, she could have afforded to leave her babies with a sitter or nanny. There's no excuse in this case.

Vicky, USA; "At 46 she ought to know better. I suspect, thought, that those kids are nothing more than an accessory to go with her escalade." Do you see anything in this comment or story that wold apply to a man? I see an article a week like this, and the only one I saw of a man was when he was unaware that he had the child in his car instead of the mother. Never because he did it on purpose, which is nearly always the case with a woman. I see so much man bashing on this site, but this is an example of why men are valuable to women in a relationship. Almost no man would rationalize doing this kind of thing, that is why these stories are always women. Almost any bad behavior can be rationalized by most women.

Why become a parent if you dont want to be seen out with your children??? Anyone can be a mother but it takes love and commitment to be a mummy

At 46 she ought to know better. I suspect, thought, that those kids are nothing more than an accessory to go with her escalade. I also would have gotten that door open to get those babies out fast.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.



Several missing after roof collapses at Canadian shopping mall - Daily Telegraph

Emergency officials quickly cleared out the mall and closed surrounding roads after the collapse triggered a gas leak. Mayor Rick Hamilton declared a state of emergency.

Ontario Provincial Police said 22 people were taken to hospital but none were seriously hurt.

Joe Drazil, a Zellers store employee, said several cars appeared to have fallen through the gaping hole near some escalators.

"You can see the roof with the cars hanging inside," he said. "Everybody was cleared from the whole mall. After that, there was numerous police and emergency vehicles coming from all over."

Source: AP



People missing after roof collapse at Canada mall - New Zealand Herald

Rescue teams and dogs searched through the rubble at a shopping mall in Canada where a roof collapsed through two floors, leaving several people missing and 22 people slightly injured.

Authorities said no casualties have been reported and the names of the missing continue to be crossed off the list as members of the community account for their loved ones. But a number of people remain unaccounted for since the collapse Saturday afternoon at Algo Centre Mall in the northern Ontario city of Elliott Lake.

Stephan Powell of Toronto Fire Services said 40 members of the Heavy Urban Search and Rescue team were removing pieces of the structure in an effort to extricate anyone who might have been trapped.

Kate Matuszewski, a spokeswoman for city, said emergency services were removed at one point Saturday due to safety issues.

Ontario Provincial Police Inspector Percy Jollymore urged anyone worried about missing loved ones to check in at an information center where police are tracking those who are unaccounted for.

A portion of the roof that serves as a parking area crumbled down two floors into an area near the food court, exposing metal and concrete supports.

Emergency officials quickly cleared out the mall and closed surrounding roads after the collapse triggered a gas leak. Mayor Rick Hamilton declared a state of emergency.

Ontario Provincial Police said 22 people were taken to hospital but none were seriously hurt.

Joe Drazil, a Zellers store employee, said several cars appeared to have fallen through the gaping hole near some escalators.

"You can see the roof with the cars hanging inside," he said. "Everybody was cleared from the whole mall. After that, there was numerous police and emergency vehicles coming from all over."

Shopper Jean-Marc Hayward was having coffee when the roof collapsed about 20 feet (6 meters) from him. He said a big hunk of concrete tumbled down through two floors and that it sounded like an explosion.

Hayward said he saw one man with a bloody face. Hayward, a dwarf who has trouble with his legs, said he couldn't run out.

"I was sucking in dust," he said.

Hayward and others have said the mall roof has leaked water for some time. There have long been buckets and tarps around the mall to collect leaking water, Hayward said.

"It's obvious there has been a lot of damage in the structure because of the water," Hayward said. "A couple of years ago they said they fixed all the leaks in the mall, but they didn't. You could tell every time it rained."

Powell could not confirm if rescue officials had been briefed about the water leaking issue.

The two-level mall in this northern Ontario community is approximately 200,000 square feet (18,580 sq. meters). It houses a grocery store, restaurants, a number of retail outlets, a hotel, and the constituency office for a member of the provincial parliament.

Calls to the management office and the Algo Inn hotel attached to the mall were not answered.

- AP



Duty-Free Limit Rules: Canadian Cross-Border Shoppers Planning Bigger Hauls Under New Regulations - huffingtonpost.ca

OTTAWA - Canadians are in a U.S. shopping state of mind this summer thanks to changes in regulations that allow them to buy more without paying duty, a new survey suggests.

The Canadian Press-Harris Decima poll on relaxed cross-border shopping limits that went into effect June 1 found a large majority in favour of the changes — and 54 per cent of those planning a trip stateside said they intended to spend more.

Additionally, four in 10 said they were likely to purchase more duty-free goods.

The telephone survey of 1,000 was conducted between June 14 and 18 and is considered accurate plus or minus 3.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

As outlined in the March budget, the duty-free threshold on stays longer than 24 hours rose to $200 from $50 beginning this month. The limit on stays longer than 48 hours increased to $800 from the current two-tiered levels of $400 and $750, depending on the length of stay.

In the poll, seven in 10 Canadians said they supported the higher duty-free limits, and eight of 10 of vacationers to the U.S. backed the changes.

"The potential number of Canadians travelling to the U.S. this summer is over four million," said Patricia Thacker, Harris Decima's vice-president of travel and leisure.

"With 54 per cent likely to purchase more under the new duty-free limits, that's over two million Canadians spending more in the U.S. this summer alone."

The changes have been criticized by the Retail Council of Canada as just one more blow to merchants who cope with higher costs and must compete with U.S. competitors that often get a better deal from suppliers.

With the new rules in place for a little more than three weeks, it is still too early to determine if Canadians have stepped up their shopping habits, said Karen Proud of the Retail Council. But she believes there will be an impact on retailers.

"We've seen increases in cross-border shopping ever since the loonie gained parity," she said. "There's been an increase of Canadians shopping in the U.S. and a decrease in Americans coming across the border to shop here.

"The (higher limits are) just added incentive."

Proud said Ottawa erred in enacting the duty-free changes, which now match those in the U.S., in isolation of other measures to help Canadian retailers compete, including reducing tariffs and tackling the supply management system that protects dairy and poultry farmers in Canada.

"Those products are some of the most cross-border shopped. Dairy, eggs, milk, we know people are filling up their trunks with groceries and then shopping for everything else they can pick up and basically being waved through the border," she said.

A comparison study published by the Bank of Montreal in April found that despite the near-parity of the Canadian and U.S. dollars in most months since 2007, consumer items are still on average 14 per cent more expensive in Canada, and that is before the HST tax is added. Some surveys have found a bigger gap.

The report estimated that Canadian store owners lose about $20 billion a year to cross-border shopping, although with many shoppers not reporting purchases, the exact worth of cross-border shopping is difficult to calculate.

BMO economist Doug Porter, who has done the price comparison list for several years, said today's shoppers would likely realize somewhat fewer savings because the loonie has dropped below parity in recent weeks. On Friday, it was trading below 98 cents U.S.

But Porter said that in general his findings stand, and the latest hit on Canadian retailers likely will be significant.

"Cross-border shopping tends to be downplayed by officials and the impact on the Canadian economy, but I do think it's quite significant," he said. The higher limits will just add further juice to what already looked like a "pretty robust cross-border outlook."

  • The Rules Have Changed

    The biggest change to cross-border shopping is the increased allowances to duty-free purchases. Canadian travellers outside the country for more than 24 hours can now bring in up to $200 in goods. The previous limit was capped at $50. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/blmurch/" target="_hplink">Photo courtesy of: Flickr/ blmurch </a>

  • The Rules Have Changed: Part II

    As of June 1, Canadians who find themselves outside of the border for 48 hours or longer will have their allowance double from $400 to $800. The limit for travellers outside of the country for more than seven days has also changed. <a href="http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/media/facts-faits/106-eng.html" target="_hplink">Their limit has increased by $50 from $750 to $800</a>.

  • It's All About Timing

    For those looking to capitalize on the new duty-free rules, here's some advice: plan accordingly as the new rules are still time sensitive. For example, Canadians can't claim duty-free status on any goods if their trip less than 24 hours. Also, the date you left Canada <a href="http://www.taxfreetravel.com/Canada Duty Free Exemptions" target="_hplink">doesn't count towards your trip length</a>, but the day you return can.

  • Personal vs Commercial Use

    The duty-free status still only applies if your purchases are for personal use. That means it can be for your house, a souvenir, or anything else for your own personal enjoyment. However, if it's anything for commercial use, expect to pay full duties. Also, while you can bring back gifts for other people under your duty-free allowance, that allowance can't be shared with other people.

  • The Rules To Alcohol Still Apply

    The rules regarding alcohol purchases outside of Canada still hold true, despite the increased in allowance. For example, you can only claim duty-free status if your trip is 48 hours or longer in length. Also worth noting is that only <strong>one</strong> of the following items can count towards your allowance: 1.14 L (40 oz.) of liquor; OR 1.5 L of wine; OR 24 X 355 ml (12 oz.) containers of beer.

  • Exemptions Exist

    Shoppers can expect to rake in many goods across the border with Canada's new rules, but certain items are still off limits. For example, certain fruits, meats and vegetables are prohibited from entering Canada as are weapons such as guns, mace, and pepper spray -- something worth noting if you find yourself at the local gun show.

  • The Rules To Tobacco Still Apply

    Much like alcohol, the rules to tobacco are still in effect. Canadians need to be outside of the country for at least 48 hours but can bring in any of the following as part of their duty-free purchase: 200 cigarettes; 50 cigars or cigarillos; 200 tobacco sticks; and 200 g (7 oz.) of manufactured tobacco.

  • Ready Your Receipts

    Now that the purchases have been made, all that's left is to get them back into Canada and that's where receipts come into play. Canadian Border Services Agency workers may ask for proof of any purchase and having them on hand may be the difference maker between a five-minute process and a five-hour delay. Receipts can also help verify how long your trip was based on the date of your purchases.

  • Don't Forget To Pack Your Goods

    Canadians can now make more purchases over the border but they still need to be sure that they can bring everything back. That's because the CBSA still limits the duty-free status to goods on your possession when returning. There is one exception to this rule though: travellers gone longer than seven days can have the duty-free status apply to their <a href="http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/media/facts-faits/106-eng.html" target="_hplink">goods delivered to them via mail, courier, or by a delivery agency.</a>



No comments:

Post a Comment